Lim v. Nojiri et al
Chang Lim |
Chisato Nojiri, Terumo Americas Holdings, Inc, Keith Proctor, Bill Pinion, Terumo Heart, Inc, Gael Tisack, Terumo Cardiovascular Systems and Terumo Corporation |
2:2010cv14080 |
October 12, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Washtenaw |
Paul D Borman |
Mark A. Randon |
P.I.: Other |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 51 MOTION for Leave to File Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint filed by Chang Lim, and Denying as Moot 49 MOTION for Order for a Delay of the Lawsuit filed by Chang Lim; Dismissing defendant Terumo Corporation without prejudice for lack of diversity subject matter jurisdiction and Closing Case. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (LWag) |
Filing 52 OPINION and ORDER granting 44 Motion to join in relief sought by other defendants; denying 45 Motion to Set Aside and Amending this Court's April 28, 2011 Opinion and Order. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DGoo) |
Filing 43 OPINION AND ORDER Granting Defendants' 7 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (CGre) |
Filing 35 ORDER requesting limited submission of documentary evidence re 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction filed by Gael Tisack, Bill Pinion, Terumo Cardiovascular Systems, Terumo Heart, Inc, Keith Proctor, Terumo Americas Holdings, Inc, Chisato Nojiri. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DGoo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.