Stockman v. Berghuis
Petitioner: John Stockman
Respondent: Mary Berghuis
Case Number: 2:2010cv14860
Filed: December 7, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Muskegon
Presiding Judge: R. Steven Whalen
Presiding Judge: Lawrence P. Zatkoff
Nature of Suit: General
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; DECLINING TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY OR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Signed by District Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff. (MVer)
January 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER denying 16 Motion for Oral Argument; denying 17 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 18 Motion to Extend. Signed by District Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff. (MVer)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stockman v. Berghuis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John Stockman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mary Berghuis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?