Al-Amri et al v. Continental Aluminum Corporation et al
| Abdulwali Al-Amri, Marwan Al-Dhufri, Ali Algharazi, Manea Al-Hajj, Yehya Nasser Al-Haj, Abdulrazag Ghaleb Al-Wasim, Tawfik Amer Mana, Najib Muthana-Huse Munasar, Hussein Mohammed Nasser and Hussein Sharif |
| Continental Aluminum Corporation, David Rinehart, Robert Tremper and Henry Szybwicz |
| 2:2011cv10420 |
| February 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Wayne |
| Mona K Majzoub |
| Lawrence P Zatkoff |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Signed by District Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff. (BSoc)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs (Palmer, Robert) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Continental Aluminum Corporation, David Rinehart, Henry Szybwicz, Robert Tremper* (TMcg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and jury demand filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-2823191 - Fee: $ 350. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Oakland. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Carlson, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
