Halcomb v. McQuiggin
Petitioner: John Halcomb
Respondent: Greg McQuiggin
Case Number: 2:2011cv11097
Filed: March 16, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Chippewa
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Hluchaniuk
Presiding Judge: David M. Lawson
Nature of Suit: General
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 14 OPINION and ORDER Dismissing the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Denying A Certificate of Applealability, And Denying Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal.Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (Bankston, T)
December 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER Denying Petitioner's 10 Motion for ORAL ARGUMENT. Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (Bankston, T)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Halcomb v. McQuiggin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John Halcomb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Greg McQuiggin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?