Ferris & Salter, PC v. Thomson Reuters Corporation
| FERRIS and SALTER, P.C. |
| THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION |
| 2:2011cv12448 |
| June 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Washtenaw |
| Julian Abele Cook |
| Michael J. Hluchaniuk |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| TEXT-ONLY NOTICE: MOTION HEARING ON AUGUST 11, 2011 IS CANCELLED re 7 Notice of Hearing on Motion. MOTION WILL BE DECIDED ON THE BRIEFS. (KDoa) |
| Filing 8 REPLY to Response re 5 MOTION to Dismiss Or, In The Alternative, To Transfer To The United States District Court For The District Of Minnesota filed by All Defendants. (Boonstra, Mark) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of hearing on 5 MOTION to Dismiss Or, In The Alternative, To Transfer To The United States District Court For The District Of Minnesota. Motion Hearing set for 8/11/2011 09:00 AM before District Judge Julian Abele Cook. (KDoa) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to 5 MOTION to Dismiss Or, In The Alternative, To Transfer To The United States District Court For The District Of Minnesota filed by FERRIS and SALTER, P.C.. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1 - Series of Emails, # 3 Exhibit 2 - Plaintiff's Complaint) (Ferris, Donald) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss Or, In The Alternative, To Transfer To The United States District Court For The District Of Minnesota by THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Declaration of Michael J. Mokosaik) (Boonstra, Mark) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by FERRIS and SALTER, P.C. (Ferris, Donald) |
| Filing 3 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION (Boonstra, Mark) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re 1 Notice of Removal, by THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION (Boonstra, Mark) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION from Washtenaw, case number 11-478-NO. Receipt No: 0645-3012683 - Fee: $ 350 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Boonstra, Mark) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (TMcg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ferris & Salter, PC v. Thomson Reuters Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: FERRIS and SALTER, P.C. | |
| Represented By: | Donald W. Ferris, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION | |
| Represented By: | Mark T. Boonstra |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
