Burton v. Parks et al
Kenneth Burton |
Jeanna M Bitler, Maurice B Potts, Marvin Keeling, J Parks, Tiffany H Cannefax, John R. Kearney, Amy J Bidlack, Harriet Squier, K Peters and Jeffrey Stieve |
2:2011cv14768 |
October 28, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Gratiot |
Laurie J. Michelson |
Stephen J. Murphy |
Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 107 ORDER Adopting 105 Report and Recommendation - Granting 91 Motion for Summary Judgment,, filed by John R. Kearney, Marvin Keeling, Maurice B Potts, Harriet Squier and Dismissing the Case. Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (CCoh) |
Filing 60 ORDER Adopting 53 Report and Recommendation and Granting 41 Motion to Dismiss Medical Negligence and Gross Negligence Claims, filed by John R. Kearney, Marvin Keeling, Maurice B Potts, Harriet Squier. Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (CCoh) |
Filing 59 ORDER Adopting 46 Report and Recommendation and Granting 17 Defendants' Motion for Summary Jugment. Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (CCoh) |
Filing 34 OPINION AND ORDER Adopting 12 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation:Denying 10 Plaintiff's Motion to take Judicial Notice; and Denying 9 Plaintiff's Motion for an Immediate TRO and Preliminary Injunction. Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (CCoh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.