Dawson v. Rapelje
Petitioner: Timothy Dawson
Respondent: Lloyd Rapelje
Case Number: 2:2011cv15626
Filed: December 23, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Saginaw
Presiding Judge: Mark A. Randon
Presiding Judge: George Caram Steeh
Nature of Suit: General
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 OPINION AND ORDER granting Petitioner's Motion non-prejudicial dismissal 6 7 , dismissing without prejudice the habeas petition, and denying a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh (MBea)
April 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER denying 4 petitioner's Motion to Stay and Abeyance. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh (MBea)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dawson v. Rapelje
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Timothy Dawson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lloyd Rapelje
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?