Romain v. St. Joseph Mercy Hospital
Plaintiff: Nicole Romain
Defendant: St. Joseph Mercy Hospital
Case Number: 2:2011cv15679
Filed: December 28, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Livingston
Presiding Judge: Avern Cohn
Presiding Judge: Mark A. Randon
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 29 Memorandum and Order Sustaining Defendant's 26 Objections and Adopting in Part and Rejecting in Part 25 Report and Recommendation and Granting Defendant's 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (SCha)
October 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting 17 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon. (Miles, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Romain v. St. Joseph Mercy Hospital
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: St. Joseph Mercy Hospital
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Romain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?