Subpoena to Ford Motor Company et al v. McKechnie Vehicle Components USA, Incorporated
Plaintiff: Lacks Industries, Incorporated
Defendant: McKechnie Vehicle Components USA, Incorporated
Petitioner: Ford Motor Company
In Re: Subpoena to Ford Motor Company
Case Number: 2:2011mc50200
Filed: February 15, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Wayne
Presiding Judge: Paul D Borman
Referring Judge: Paul J Komives
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2011 Filing 11 NOTICE by Ford Motor Company of withdrawal of #1 MOTION for Attorney Fees, #4 MOTION for Attorney Fees (Supplemental) Incurred in Responding to McKechnie's Subpoenas (Angileri, Frank) Modified on 4/14/2011 (PMil).
March 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response and rescheduling hearing on said motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives. (DTyl)
March 23, 2011 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven L. Underwood on behalf of Lacks Industries, Incorporated. (Underwood, Steven)
March 23, 2011 Minute Entry - Motion hearing Not Held
March 21, 2011 Filing 8 Ex Parte MOTION TO EXTEND Time to Respond to Non-Party Ford Motor Co's Motion for Reimbursement of Attorney Fees in Responding to Plaintiff's Subpoena & to Reschedule Hearing on Such Motion re #1 MOTION for Attorney Fees, #4 MOTION for Attorney Fees (Supplemental) Incurred in Responding to McKechnie's Subpoenas MOTION for Attorney Fees (Supplemental) Incurred in Responding to McKechnie's Subpoenas MOTION for Attorney Fees (Supplemental) Incurred in Responding to McKechnie's Subpoenas MOTION for Attorney Fees (Supplemental) Incurred in Responding to McKechnie's Subpoenas MOTION for Attorney Fees (Supplemental) Incurred in Responding to McKechnie's Subpoenas, MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by McKechnie Vehicle Components USA, Incorporated. (Ribiat, Steven)
March 21, 2011 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven M. Ribiat on behalf of McKechnie Vehicle Components USA, Incorporated. (Ribiat, Steven)
March 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STIPULATED ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEALINE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives. (EBut)
February 23, 2011 Filing 5 NOTICE of hearing on #1 MOTION for Attorney Fees. Motion Hearing set for 3/23/2011 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Paul J Komives. (EBut)
February 17, 2011 Filing 4 MOTION for Attorney Fees (Supplemental) Incurred in Responding to McKechnie's Subpoenas by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Declaration of Kevin Heinl, #3 Exhibit A - 3/23/2010 Subpoenas, #4 Exhibit B - 4/26/2010 letter from Heinl to Chaudhary, #5 Exhibit C - 4/24/2010 letter from Heinl to Chaudhary, #6 Exhibit D - 5/5/2010 letter from Chaudhary to Heinl, #7 Exhibit E - 6/8/2010 email from Heinl to Chaudhary, #8 Exhibit F - 6/15/2010 letter from Chaudhary to Heinl, #9 Exhibit G - 6/17/2010 email from Heinl to Chaudhary, #10 Exhibit H - 9/9/2010 email from Chaudhary to Heinl, #11 Exhibit I - 9/9/2010 email from Heinl to Chaudhary, #12 Exhibit J - 9/9/2010 email from Chaudhary to Heinl, #13 Exhibit K - 9/14/2010 email from Heinl to Chaudhary, #14 Exhibit L - 9/14/2010 email from Chaudhary to Heinl, #15 Exhibit M - 9/17/2010 email from Chaudhary to Heinl, #16 Exhibit N - 9/20/2010 email from Heinl to Chaudhary, #17 Exhibit O - Brooks Kushman October & November 2010 Invoices) (Angileri, Frank)
February 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Paul J Komives: #1 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Ford Motor Company. Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. (DGoo)
February 15, 2011 Filing 2 EXHIBITS re #1 MOTION for attorney fees by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation) (DPer)
February 15, 2011 Filing 1 MOTION for Reimbursement of Attorney Fees in Responding to Plaintiff's Subpoena by Ford Motor Company, Receipt No: DET020191, Fee: $39. (CGre)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Subpoena to Ford Motor Company et al v. McKechnie Vehicle Components USA, Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: Subpoena to Ford Motor Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lacks Industries, Incorporated
Represented By: Steven L. Underwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: McKechnie Vehicle Components USA, Incorporated
Represented By: Steven M. Ribiat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Frank A. Angileri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?