Armstrong v. SCIS Air Security
Plaintiff: Jermaine Armstrong
Defendant: SCIS Air Security
Case Number: 2:2012cv10276
Filed: January 20, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Wayne
Presiding Judge: Marianne O. Battani
Presiding Judge: R. Steven Whalen
Nature of Suit: Employment
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER Denying Objection and Adopting Report and Recommendation for 50 Report and Recommendation, 31 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by SCIS Air Security. Signed by District Judge Marianne O. Battani. (BThe)
August 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (MWil)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Armstrong v. SCIS Air Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SCIS Air Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jermaine Armstrong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?