Smith v. Heyns et al
| Fredrick Smith |
| Jane Price, Joel Morrill, Maryann Bullehanger, Laura Heinritz, J Lucky, Daniel Heyns, Dennis Straud, Thomas Combs, Charles Brown, Michigan Department of Corrections, C Dryer and Stephen DeBoer |
| 2:2012cv11373 |
| March 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Jackson |
| Nancy G. Edmunds |
| Paul J. Komives |
| Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER Overruling Plaintiff's Objections 75 and Accepting and Adopting the Magistrate Judge's June 21, 2013 Report and Recommendation 74 Granting Defendants' 59 , 69 Motions for Summary Judgment; Denying Plaintiff's 70 Motion to Stay Summary Judgment, and Denying Plaintiff's 65 Second Motion to Amend. Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (JCur)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER denying 22 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 22 Motion for TRO; granting 32 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 42 Motion for Judgment; denying 41 43 Motion for Judgment; denying 58 Motion ; adopting 60 Report and Recommendation ; denying 12 Motion for TRO; denying 12 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; granting 19 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (CHem)
|
|
Filing
63
OPINION and ORDER Overruling Plaintiff's Objections 57 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision, 47 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (CHem)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
