Robert Bosch LLC v. Snap-On Incorporated
| Robert Bosch LLC |
| Drew Technologies, Incorporated and Snap-On Incorporated |
| 2:2012cv11503 |
| April 4, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Robert H. Cleland |
| Mark A. Randon |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
126
ORDER Suspending All Formal Proceedings. (TELEPHONIC Status Conference set for 8/29/2013 at 10:00 AM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland). Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (Monda, H)
|
|
Filing
123
OPINION AND ORDER Construing Claims Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
95
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 66 Motion to Compel Plaintiff's interrogatory responses. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER GRANTING 82 MOTION TO EXTEND Deadline for Fact Discovery filed by Drew Technologies, Incorporated, Snap-On Incorporated., ( Fact Discovery Extended to 6/24/2013 and Resetting Markman Hearing to 7/17/2013 02:00 PM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER Directing Defendants to file a Motion to Extend Fact Discovery(Motion due by 3/19/2013 and Responses due by 3/22/2013) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
77
OPINION AND ORDER granting 40 Defendants' Motion to Seal; granting in part and denying in part 41 Defendants' Motion to Compel. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
74
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion to Compel and for Order Imposing Sanctions; granting 43 Defendants' Motion to Seal; granting 46 Defendants' Motion to Seal; denying 47 Defendants' Motion to Compel; denying 58 Plaintiff's Motion to preclude late reply brief ; granting 59 Defendants' Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to delay filing a response brief to Defendants' Motion to Compel Interrogatory Responses [Dkt #68]. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER to Strike 36 Response to Motion filed by Drew Technologies, Incorporated, Snap-On Incorporated, 37 Cross MOTION to Compel PLAINTIFF BOSCH TO DISCLOSE ITS INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS filed by Drew Technologies, Incorporated, S nap-On Incorporated, 35 Sealed Response to Motion, filed by Drew Technologies, Incorporated, Snap-On Incorporated AND Setting Deadline for response as to Plaintiff's Motions to Compel Discoery 33 :( Responses due by 12/18/2012) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
11
SCHEDULING ORDER for Patent Infringement Case., ( Technology Tutorial Conference set for 11/26/2012 02:00 PM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland, Markman Hearing set for 4/17/2013 02:00 PM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland) (see order for additional deadlines) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
9
PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER Setting ( Telephone Conference for 5/23/2012 10:00 PM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER Setting Telephone Conference ( Telephone Conference set for 5/9/2012 10:00 AM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
