Richardson v. Detroit Retirement Systems
Plaintiff: Donald Richardson
Defendant: Detroit Retirement Systems
Case Number: 2:2012cv12361
Filed: May 31, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Ann Arbor Office
County: Montcalm
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Hluchaniuk
Presiding Judge: John Corbett O'Meara
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER Adopting 26 Report and Recommendation re 23 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Detroit Retirement Systems. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)
August 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER denying 11 Motion to Disqualify Judge. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richardson v. Detroit Retirement Systems
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Detroit Retirement Systems
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?