Carter v. Curley
Petitioner: Perry Carter
Respondent: Michael Curley
Case Number: 2:2012cv13785
Filed: August 27, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Baraga
Presiding Judge: Gerald E. Rosen
Presiding Judge: Laurie J. Michelson
Nature of Suit: General
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER DISMISSING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Without Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Gerald E. Rosen. (JOwe)
June 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 11 OPINION and ORDER GRANTING Petitioner's 10 MOTION to Hold 1 Habeas Petition in Abeyance and Administratively Closing Case Signed by District Judge Gerald E. Rosen. (Loury, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carter v. Curley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Perry Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Michael Curley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?