Williamson v. Woods
Petitioner: Rodney Williamson
Respondent: Jeffrey Woods
Case Number: 2:2012cv14323
Filed: September 28, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
County: Chippewa
Presiding Judge: Nancy G. Edmunds
Presiding Judge: David R. Grand
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 OPINION and ORDER Summarily Denying the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; Denying Petitioner's Motions for Equitable Tolling 7 and for the Appointment of Counsel 8 and Declining to Issue a Certificate of Appealability and Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (JCur)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williamson v. Woods
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rodney Williamson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jeffrey Woods
Represented By: Laura Moody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?