Dibbern v. University of Michigan et al
Jennifer Dibbern |
University of Michigan, The Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, Mary Sue Coleman, Rachel Goldman and Tresa Pollock |
2:2012cv15632 |
December 21, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Washtenaw |
Sean F. Cox |
Paul J. Komives |
Civil Rights: Education |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 138 OPINION and ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) |
Filing 105 ORDER OVERRULING 99 Objection to 97 Order on Motion to Compel by All Defendants. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) |
Filing 103 ORDER Overruling 81 Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judge's Order, filed by Jennifer Dibbern. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) |
Filing 80 ORDER granting in part Defendants' 48 Motion to Compel to Privilege Log Documents--Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives. (MWil) |
Filing 79 ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 45 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives. (MWil) |
Filing 36 OPINION AND ORDER granting 32 Motion to Extend; denying 25 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) |
Filing 19 ORDER re 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Tresa Pollock, Rachel Goldman, Peter Green, Mary Sue Coleman, University of Michigan, The Board of Regents of the University of Michigan. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.