ViSalus Inc. v. Smith
Plaintiff: ViSalus Inc.
Defendant: Kody Smith
Case Number: 2:2013cv10631
Filed: February 14, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
County: Oakland
Presiding Judge: Terrence G. Berg
Presiding Judge: R. Steven Whalen
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery/Enforcement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER denying 10 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (Chubb, A)
February 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER denying 8 Motion to Reassign Case; denying 2 Motion for TRO. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ViSalus Inc. v. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ViSalus Inc.
Represented By: Peter R. Bulmer
Represented By: Tiffany A. Buckley-Norwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kody Smith
Represented By: David L. Hartsell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?