Harrell v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Plaintiff: Tamika M. Harrell
Defendant: Social Security, Commissioner of
Case Number: 2:2013cv11161
Filed: March 15, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
County: Wayne
Presiding Judge: Avern Cohn
Presiding Judge: Mark A. Randon
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 Memorandum and Order Overruling Plaintiff's 18 Objections, Adopting the Magistrate Judge's 16 Report and Recommendation, Denying Plaintiff's 10 Motion for Summary Judgment, Granting Commissioner's 13 Motion for Summary Judgment, Affirming the Commissioner's Decision Denying Benefits and Dismissing Case. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (SCha)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harrell v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tamika M. Harrell
Represented By: Kiel J. Roeschke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?