Stephenson v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC
Marshall Stephenson |
Green Tree Servicing, LLC |
2:2013cv11210 |
March 19, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Oakland |
Terrence G. Berg |
David R. Grand |
Consumer Credit |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 ORDER DENYING 14 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING 15 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss; and GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART Defendant's 15 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (Chubb, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Stephenson v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Marshall Stephenson | |
Represented By: | Brian P. Parker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Green Tree Servicing, LLC | |
Represented By: | Courtney A. Krause |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.