Petros v. AG Lining, Inc.
Plaintiff: Evan Petros
Defendant: AG Lining, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2013cv11745
Filed: April 18, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
County: Oakland
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Hluchaniuk
Presiding Judge: Stephen J. Murphy
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER Granting in part and Overruling in part Objections, Adopting Report and Recommendation 25 , in part, and Granting in part 20 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs. Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (CCoh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Petros v. AG Lining, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Evan Petros
Represented By: Steven M. Hyder
Represented By: Pete M. Monismith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AG Lining, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?