Fernandez v. Hartford Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Layna Tyus Fernandez
Defendant: Hartford Life Insurance Company
Case Number: 2:2013cv12304
Filed: May 23, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
County: Wayne
Presiding Judge: Marianne O. Battani
Presiding Judge: Paul J. Komives
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 11 OPINION AND ORDER granting 10 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record, Granting Defendant's Motion for Judgment on its Counterclaim, and affirming the decision of the Plan Administrator. Signed by District Judge Marianne O. Battani. (BThe)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fernandez v. Hartford Life Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hartford Life Insurance Company
Represented By: Kimberly J. Ruppel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Layna Tyus Fernandez
Represented By: Gary S. Fields
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?