AES-Apex Employer Services, Inc. et al v. Rotondo et al
Plaintiff: AES-Apex Employer Services, Inc. and AES-Apex Employer Solutions, Inc.
Defendant: Dino Rotondo, Richard Mark and United States Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service
Case Number: 2:2013cv14519
Filed: October 29, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Oakland
Presiding Judge: Robert H. Cleland
Presiding Judge: David R. Grand
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2410
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 196 OPINION and ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Request for Indemnification and Directing the Parties to Submit a Proposed Order of Judgment, Stipulated as to Form by 5/1/2020 Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
August 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 191 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 179 IRS'S Motion for Determination that Dino Rotundo Continues to Earn Consulting Fees; GRANTING 183 Motion for Disbursement of Funds held in the Court's Registry and DIRECTING AES to file a response to the IRS's Proposed Categorization of indemnifiable fees by 9/20/2019, Reply by IRS by 10/11/2019. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
December 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 170 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 164 MOTION To Compel Plaintiffs to provide Intervenor with a copy of the accounting they have filed with the Court along with the back-up documentation which supports the accounting. filed by Akouri Investm ents, LLC, DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE 155 MOTION for Contempt against Plaintiffs and/or Their Attorneys for Not Complying with Courts 7/31/2017 Order filed by United States Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service., ( TELEPHONIC Status Conference set for 2/14/2018 10:00 AM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
July 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 149 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 138 IRS's Motion for Reconsideration and CLARIFYING the Court's Order 135 to indicate that dismissal on Count II of Akouri's declaratory judgment claim is with prejudice; DENYING 139 AES's Motio n for Reconsideration; DENYING 140 Akouri's Motion for Reconsideration and GRANTING 143 IRS's Motion to Compel AES to deposit all Consulting Fees accrued to date per the Court's prior order 135 and the R&R 110 without deduction made for attorney fees, into an escrow account with the court on or before August 7, 2017 and DIRECTING AES to file with the court an accounting by the same date.. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
September 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 137 ORDER Adopting 129 Report and Recommendation for 106 Motion for Sanctions filed by AES-Apex Employer Services, Inc., Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
September 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 135 ORDER AND OPINION (1) SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, (2) ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, (3) GRANTING THE IRS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, (4) DENYING AKOUR I INVESTMENTS, LLCS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, (4) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO INTERPLEAD FUNDS, FOR DISMISSAL, AND FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEY FEES, AND (5) DISMISSING AKOURI INVESTMENTS LLCs CROSS-CLAIM Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
January 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER VACATING [Dkt. #83] REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; TERMINATING AS MOOT, the parties' Objections [Dkt. ##84, 85} AND ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge David R. Grand: For a Report and Recommendation re: 98 MOTION Motion for Post Judgment Relief filed by Akouri Investments, LLC, and REFERRING BACK 45 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Akouri Investments, LLC, 44 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by United States Depart ment of Treasury Internal Revenue Service, 46 MOTION to Dismiss filed by AES-Apex Employer Services, Inc., 64 MOTION to Strike 58 Reply to Response to Motion, filed by Akouri Investments, LLC to either reissue the report and recommendation or alter the report and recommendation in response to the filed objections. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
July 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER denying 76 Motion to Stay. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
May 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 26 OPINION and ORDER Granting 23 MOTION to Set Aside 17 Clerks Entry of Judgment by Default Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (EBut)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AES-Apex Employer Services, Inc. et al v. Rotondo et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AES-Apex Employer Services, Inc.
Represented By: David B. Timmis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AES-Apex Employer Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: David B. Timmis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dino Rotondo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Mark
Represented By: Bradley S. Defoe
Represented By: Eric Nemeth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service
Represented By: Patrick B. Gushue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?