Salem et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
| Amira Salem and Keshuna Abcumby |
| Michigan Department of Corrections, Daniel H. Heyns, THOMAS FINCO, Dennis Straub, RANDY TREACHER and Millicent Warren |
| 2:2013cv14567 |
| November 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Washtenaw |
| Paul D. Borman |
| R. Steven Whalen |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 66 MOTION to Certify Class filed by Amira Salem, Keshuna Abcumby, DENYING 95 MOTION for Leave to File Additional Affidavits filed by Amira Salem, Keshuna Abcumby., ( AND SETTING Bench Trial for 11/6/2019 10:00 AM before District Judge Paul D. Borman) *SEE OPINION AND ORDER FOR MATERIALS SUBMISSION DEADLINES* Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
|
|
Filing
90
OPINION AND ORDER Denying 64 Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and Denying 65 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin)
|
|
Filing
56
OPINION AND ORDER denying 44 Motion to Certify Class. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
|
|
Filing
21
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
