Matje v. Zestos et al
| Thomas Matje |
| Zestos, William Malatinsky and S Gidell |
| 2:2013cv14791 |
| November 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Washtenaw |
| R. Steven Whalen |
| Lawrence P. Zatkoff |
| Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER (1) Granting Defendants' 40 Motion for Summary Judgment and (2) Denying Plaintiff's 42 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 56 MOTION for Extension to Object to Magistrate Judge's 53 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (Objections to Report & Recommendation due by 3/20/2017.) Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 38 Motion to Appoint Counsel - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER (1) Sustaining in Part and Overruling in Part Plaintiff's 25 Objections to the 24 Report and Recommendation Dated February 28, 2015, and (2) Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' 20 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (Monda, H)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER GRANTING 15 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (MWil)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
