Auburn Sales, Inc. v. Cypros Trading & Shipping, Inc. et al
Auburn Sales, Inc. |
Cypros Trading & Shipping, Inc., Joseph Kilani and Fadi Kilani |
2:2014cv10922 |
February 28, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Flint Office |
Oakland |
Terrence G. Berg |
Mona K. Majzoub |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 129 OPINION and ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 125 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou) |
Filing 123 OPINION and ORDER (1) Granting In Part and Denying In Part Plaintiff's 107 Motion for Summary Judgment; and (2) Denying as Moot 110 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou) |
Filing 118 ORDER granting 75 Motion to Compel Discovery and granting 90 Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer - Signed by Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub. (LBar) |
Filing 100 OPINION and ORDER Denying Defendants' 73 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou) |
Filing 71 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' 40 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (Sian, M) |
Filing 21 ORDER Regarding Evidentiary Hearing as to 11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Fadi Kilani, Joseph Kilani, Cypros Trading & Shipping, Inc.. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (LWag) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.