Cummings v. Heyns et al
| Walter Cummings |
| Paul Klee, S Campbell, L McRoberts and McConnel |
| 2:2014cv10957 |
| March 4, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Branch |
| Michael J. Hluchaniuk |
| Arthur J. Tarnow |
| Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
229
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING 226 Report and Recommendation, OVERRULING 227 Defendant's Objection, and DENYING 201 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (AChu)
|
|
Filing
191
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 127 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 163 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 185 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
|
|
Filing
172
ORDER adopting 164 Report and Recommendation; Overruling 168 Plaintiff's Objection; granting 126 Motion to Amend; denying 133 Plaintiff's Second Notice of Retaliation, Request for Preliminary Injunction and Motion for Extension of Time to Respond filed by Walter Cummings and Terminating Defendant Guajardo without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER adopting in part 35 Report and Recommendation; granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
