Leapers, Inc. v. SMTS, LLC et al
| Leapers, Inc. |
| SMTS, LLC, Trarms, Inc. and Sun Optics USA |
| 2:2014cv12290 |
| June 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Wayne |
| Robert H. Cleland |
| David R. Grand |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
146
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 126 Motion for an Exceptional Case Finding, and DIRECTING Plaintiff Leapers to file a supplemental brief within two weeks. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
124
FINAL JUDGMENT Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
119
OPINION AND ORDER denying 112 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
111
OPINION AND ORDER Terminating as Moot Defendants' 78 Motion to Strike Expert Testimony. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (HMon)
|
|
Filing
40
AGGRED CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
26
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 20 Amended Motion to Dismiss, Dismissing Count III of the Complaint with prejudice and converting the Motion Hearing to a Status Conference on 10/7/2014 at 2:00 pm . Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
