Signal IP, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company
| Signal IP, Inc. |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 2:2014cv13729 |
| September 26, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Mark A Goldsmith |
| Paul J Komives |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 29
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Sandusky, K)
|
| Filing 28 Joint MOTION to Dismiss by Signal IP, Inc.. (Hatch, Ryan) |
|
Filing 27
STIPULATION AND ORDER to Move the Date for the Informal Technical Tutorial. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Sandusky, K)
|
|
Filing 26
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Sandusky, K)
|
|
Filing 25
SCHEDULING ORDER: Fact Discovery due by 9/15/2016, Markman Hearing set for 7/11/2016 at 01:30 PM before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith, Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/30/2017 at 01:30 PM before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith, Jury Trial set for 6/12/2017 at 08:30 AM before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Refer to image for additional dates) (Sandusky, K)
|
| Filing 24 JOINT REPORT RE PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Signal IP, Inc. (Hatch, Ryan) Modified on 12/22/2015 (DWor). [FIRST AMENDED] |
|
Filing 23
OPINION AND ORDER Denying Defendants Ford Motor Company's and FCA US LLC's Joint Motion to Stay All Proceedings Pending Reexamination and Inter Partes Review #13 . Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (CHad)
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER APPOINTING CHRISTOPHER G. DARROW AS SPECIAL MASTER. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (CHad)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER Regarding the Appointment of Special Master. Objections to this Appointment due by 6/19/15. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (CHad)
|
| Filing 20 NOTICE by Signal IP, Inc. Regarding Decision in California Litigation on Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Order Denying Motion to Stay) (Haas, Jason) |
| Filing 19 REPLY to Response re #13 Joint MOTION to Stay with Defendant Fiat USA Inc. in Related Case No. 2:14-cv-13864 filed by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 30 - US 6,434,486 Final Office Action, #3 Exhibit 31 - Fords November 2014 letter) (Smith, Christopher) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE to #13 Joint MOTION to Stay with Defendant Fiat USA Inc. in Related Case No. 2:14-cv-13864 filed by Signal IP, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit) (Hatch, Ryan) |
| Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith: Telephonic Scheduling/Status Conference held on 5/11/2015. Disposition: The scheduling conference will be postponed until after the Court has reviewed Plaintiff's response to Defendants' motions to stay. (JCur) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Linda D. Mettes on behalf of Ford Motor Company. (Mettes, Linda) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by John S. LeRoy on behalf of Ford Motor Company. (LeRoy, John) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Frank A. Angileri on behalf of Ford Motor Company. (Angileri, Frank) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher C. Smith on behalf of Ford Motor Company. (Smith, Christopher) |
| Filing 13 Joint MOTION to Stay with Defendant Fiat USA Inc. in Related Case No. 2:14-cv-13864 by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1 - Ford Complaint, #3 Exhibit 2 - FCA Complaint, #4 Exhibit 3 - Ford Transfer Order, #5 Exhibit 4 - FCA Transfer Order, #6 Exhibit 5 - C.D. Cal. Scheduling Order, #7 Exhibit 6 - VW-Bentley Motion to Stay, #8 Exhibit 7 - '601 Patent Reexamination Request, #9 Exhibit 8 - '486 Patent Reexamination Request, #10 Exhibit 9 - '375 Patent Reexamination Request, #11 Exhibit 10 - '601 Patent Reexamination Decision, #12 Exhibit 11 - '486 Patent Reexamination Decision, #13 Exhibit 12 - '375 Patent Reexamination Decision, #14 Exhibit 13 - '601 Patent Reexamination Rejection, #15 Exhibit 14 - '486 Patent Reexamination Rejection, #16 Exhibit 15 - '375 Patent Reexamination Rejection, #17 Exhibit 16 - IPR2015-00860 of 601 Patent, #18 Exhibit 17 - IPR2015-00861 of 601 Patent, #19 Exhibit 18 - IPR2015-00941 of 601 Patent, #20 Exhibit 19 - IPR2015-01002 of 601 Patent, #21 Exhibit 20 - IPR2015-00890 of 486 Patent, #22 Exhibit 21 - IPR2015-01005 of 486 Patent, #23 Exhibit 22 - IPR2015-01110 of 486 Patent, #24 Exhibit 23 - IPR2015-01003 of 375 Patent, #25 Exhibit 24 - IPR2015-00968 of 927 Patent, #26 Exhibit 25 - IPR2015-01004 of 007 Patent, #27 Exhibit 26 - USPTO AIA Statistics, #28 Exhibit 27 - AIA Blog - Statistics, #29 Exhibit 28 - USPTO Reexamination Statistics, #30 Exhibit 29 - '486 Patent Reexamination Response) (Smith, Christopher) |
| RESET Telephonic Conference: TELEPHONIC Scheduling/Status Conference reset for 5/11/2015 02:30 PM before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. Attorney for Plaintiff shall initiate the conference call and then include the Court when all parties are available by calling 313/234-5240. (JCur) |
| Filing 12 DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (Hatch, Ryan) |
| RESET Telephonic Conference: **TIME CHANGE ONLY** TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference reset for 4/29/2015 04:00 PM before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. Attorney for Plaintiff shall initiate the conference call and then include the Court when all parties are available by calling 313/234-5240. (JCur) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER REGARDING TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 4/29/2015 02:30 PM before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith Attorney for Plaintiff shall initiate the conference call and then include the Court when all parties are available by calling 313/234-5240 (CHad)
|
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Jason Lee Haas appearing on behalf of Signal IP, Inc. (Haas, Jason) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Ryan Ephraim Hatch appearing on behalf of Signal IP, Inc. (Hatch, Ryan) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER of DISQUALIFICATION and REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge John Corbett O'Meara in Ann arbor to District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith in Detroit. (SSch)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Signal IP, Inc. of Related Cases (Baiardi, Kristen) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristen L. Baiardi on behalf of Signal IP, Inc.. (Baiardi, Kristen) |
| Filing 5 Docket Sheet from California Central; Case Number 2:14-cv-03106. Modified on 9/26/2014 (VLun). |
|
Filing 4
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANY'S MOTION TO TRANSFER TO THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The case is TRANSFERRED to the Eastern District of Michigan. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Case sent via electronically) MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (Attachments: #1 CV 22) (lom) [Transferred from cacd on 9/26/2014.]
|
| Filing 3 COUNTERCLAIM against Counter Defendant Signal IP, Inc.; Jury Demand, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company.(LeRoy, John) [Transferred from cacd on 9/26/2014.] |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Signal IP, Inc.. (Hatch, Ryan) [Transferred from cacd on 9/26/2014.] |
| Filing 1 TRANSFERREDCOMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-13709170 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Signal IP, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Attorney Ryan E Hatch added to party Signal IP, Inc.(pty:pla))(Hatch, Ryan) [Case transferred in from California Central; Case Number 2:14-cv-03106.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
