Shimel v. Warren
Petitioner: Rebecca Jean Shimel
Respondent: Millicent Warren
Case Number: 2:2014cv14882
Filed: December 23, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Bay City Office
County: Washtenaw
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Hluchaniuk
Presiding Judge: Thomas L. Ludington
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 10 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S 6 MOTION TO AMEND THE MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF HER 1 , 2 [PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS, DENYING PETITIONER'S 1 , 2 PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS, AND GRANTING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (DPar)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shimel v. Warren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rebecca Jean Shimel
Represented By: James S. Brady
Represented By: Alison L. Carruthers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Millicent Warren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?