Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Prater Commercial Group, Inc. et al
| Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund, Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund, Carpenters' Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity, Carpenters' Vacation Fund - Detroit and Vicinity, Detroit Carpentry Joint Apprenticeship and Training Fund, Michigan Fund for the Advancement of the Carpentry Trade, Carpenters' Labor Management Productivity and Training Fund, Carpenters' Guaranty Fund, Carpenters' Industry Advancement Fund, Carpenters' Apprentice Reimbursement Fund, Carpenters' Working Dues Fund, Carpenters' Special Assessment Fund and Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America |
| Prater Commercial Group, Incorporated and Rodney Prater |
| 2:2015cv10260 |
| January 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Wayne |
| Michael J. Hluchaniuk |
| Matthew F. Leitman |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
Amended Order for Default Judgment. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (Monda, H)
|
|
Filing
10
DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Rodney Prater and Prater Commercial Group, Incorporated. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (Monda, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
