Brontkowski v. Gidley
Petitioner: Allen Brontkowski
Respondent: Lori Gidley
Case Number: 2:2015cv11073
Filed: March 18, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Gratiot
Presiding Judge: David R. Grand
Presiding Judge: Arthur J. Tarnow
Nature of Suit: General
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 9 OPINION and ORDER Denying 8 MOTION for New Trial. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (CPic)
April 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER Summarily Dismissing Without Prejudice the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Declining to Issue a Certificate of Appealability, and Granting Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (CPic)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brontkowski v. Gidley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Allen Brontkowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lori Gidley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?