Butz v. Clayton
Frank Butz |
Jerry Clayton |
2:2015cv12232 |
June 19, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Washtenaw |
Matthew F. Leitman |
Anthony P. Patti |
Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 ORDER (1) Adopting 21 Report and Recommendation and (2) Granting Defendant's 9 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 19 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendant's 15 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Jerry Clayton.--Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil) (Main Document 19 replaced on 3/31/2016) (MWil). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Butz v. Clayton | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Frank Butz | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Jerry Clayton | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.