Martin et al v. Trott Law P.C. et al
Brian J Martin and Yahmi Nundley |
Trott Law P.C., David A. Trott, Jane Doe and John Doe |
2:2015cv12838 |
August 11, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Wayne |
David R. Grand |
David M. Lawson |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 198 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT AND PLAN OF ALLOCATION, IMPOSING INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND DISMISSING CASE. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin) |
Filing 127 OPINION AND ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs' 55 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or to Strike Certain Affirmative Defenses, and Denying Defendant David Trott's 89 Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin) |
Filing 101 ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PARTIAL SEALING OF PLAINTIFFS DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SSch) |
Filing 38 OPINION AND ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 15 MOTION to Dismiss and 17 MOTION to Dismiss, Granting 27 Amended MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint and Ordering Scheduling Conference. Second Amended Complaint due by 8/8/2016. Status/Scheduling Conference set for 8/15/2016 at 10:00 AM before District Judge David M. Lawson. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.