Gunn v. Bergh
Petitioner: James Gunn
Respondent: D. Bergh
Case Number: 2:2015cv13776
Filed: October 23, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Lapeer
Presiding Judge: Matthew F. Leitman
Presiding Judge: Anthony P. Patti
Nature of Suit: General
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER Denying 18 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
October 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 OPINION and ORDER (1) Denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, (2) Denying a Certificate of Appealability, and (3) Granting Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gunn v. Bergh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Gunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: D. Bergh
Represented By: Laura Moody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?