Wahlstrom v. Monk et al
| Deborah Wahlstrom |
| Jason Monk, Edward Burley, Glenn Voorhess, Jeanine Walker and Mount Clemens Community Schools Board of Trustees |
| 2:2015cv14113 |
| November 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Macomb |
| Denise Page Hood |
| R. Steven Whalen |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 49 . Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER denying 59 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (JOwe)
|
|
Filing
58
AMENDED ORDER 38 Denying Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER denying 38 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (JOwe)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 23 Motion to Amend/Correct AND RESOLVING PLAINTIFF'S 24 Motion to Compel Defendants' Responses to Plaintiffs' Requests for Production, Compel Depositions and to Extend the Dates for Discovery - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 17 Motion to Compel; AND FOR ATTORNEY FEES - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
