McCormack v. Westland et al
Maria McCormack |
City Of Westland, Wayne Westland Fire Association, Kelly Eggers, Tim Wilson, Brenn Dohring, Chris Szpara, Highland Landscape and Snowplowing, Jeff Speaks, Jose Bhea, John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Officer Abramski and Tom Lutkenhoff |
2:2015cv14507 |
December 31, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Wayne |
Matthew F. Leitman |
Elizabeth A. Stafford |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 98 ORDER Denying 91 Petition for Attorney's Fees as Moot and Without Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 97 ORDER of Dismissal With Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 94 ORDER (1) Denying Plaintiff's 92 Motion for Reconsideration and (2) Resetting and Modifying Process for Executing Settlement Documents. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 90 AMENDED ORDER (1) Granting Westland Defendants' 76 MOTION To Enforce Settlement, (2) Granting Highland Landscape Defendants' 77 MOTION to Enforce Settlement, (3) Denying Plaintiff's 78 Motion re Proposed Oral Settlement After the Court Entered an Order Finding Defendants Violated Plaintiff's Rights, and (4) Requiring Plaintiff to Execute Necessary Settlement Documents. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 86 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 85 Motion to Compel Service from Westland Defendants. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 82 ORDER (1) Requiring the Highland Landscaping Defendants to Serve Plaintiff With Their Motion to Enforce the Settlement, (2) Setting a Date for Plaintiff to Respond to the Highland Landscaping Defendants' Motion to Enforce the Settlement, and (3) Requiring the Westland Defendants to File a Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Their Motion to Enforce the Settlement. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 79 ORDER Authorizing Transcript Redaction. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 73 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 72 Motion for Reconsideration and Briefly Extending Time for Plaintiff to Retain New Counsel. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 63 AMENDED ORDER to Attend Settlement Conference and Requirements for Submission of Settlement Statements. (Settlement Conference RESET for 10/17/2017 at 9:30 AM (**IN DETROIT -- COURTROOM 237**) before District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. **PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR IMPORTANT DEADLINE**) Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 62 ORDER to Attend Settlement Conference and Requirements for Submission of Settlement Statement. (Settlement Conference set for 10/17/2017 at 9:30 AM before District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. **PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR IMPORTANT DEADLINE**) Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 61 SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER on Plaintiff's 40 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 60 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's 40 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 48 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 42 Motion for Protective Order Regarding Examinations. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 43 ORDER Amending Scheduling Order and Regulating Continued Discovery. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.