Dougherty v. Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Kevin L Dougherty
Defendant: Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. and Tim M Mayleben
Case Number: 2:2016cv10089
Filed: January 12, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Washtenaw
Presiding Judge: Arthur J. Tarnow
Presiding Judge: R. Steven Whalen
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 78
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 207 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S 150 MOTION to Strike 149 Sealed Document - Other, (Notice of Recent Factual Developments) filed by Tim M Mayleben, Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 198 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 124 Joint MOTION to Quash Plaintiffs' Subpoena of Defendants' Lead Trial Counsel, Motions terminated: 124 Joint MOTION to Quash Plaintiffs' Subpoena of Defendants' Lead Trial Counsel filed by Tim M Mayleben, Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 193 ORDER Adopting 152 Report and Recommendation and granting 66 SEALED MOTION Class Certification, Appoint Class Representatives, and Appoint Class Counsel by Walter J Minett, Ronald E filed by Walter J Minett, Ronald E Wallace and overruling 159 Objection, filed by Tim M Mayleben, Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
June 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 157 ORDER GRANTING PARTIES' 154 Motion to Amend/Correct - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
May 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 152 OPINION and ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' 66 SEALED MOTION Class Certification, Appoint Class Representatives, and Appoint Class Counsel re 65 MOTION to Seal for Leave to File Motion for Class Certification Under Seal by Walter J Minett, Ronald E - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
July 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER GRANTING 69 Sealed Motion- Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
December 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER granting 30 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dougherty v. Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin L Dougherty
Represented By: Sharon S. Almonrode
Represented By: E. Powell Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew J. Boettcher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tim M Mayleben
Represented By: Matthew J. Boettcher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?