Livonia Public Schools et al v. Selective Insurance Company of the Southeast
| Livonia Public Schools and Metropolitan Association for Improved School Legislation |
| Selective Insurance Company of the Southeast |
| 2:2016cv10324 |
| February 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Wayne |
| Paul D. Borman |
| Stephanie Dawkins Davis |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
OPINION AND ORDER:(1) GRANTING 92 DEFENDANTS MOTION TO CONFIRM SATISFACTION OF DEFENSE OBLIGATIONS AND DISMISS COUNTS VII AND VIII OF PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT AS MOOT, and(2) DENYING 94 PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO APPORTION ALL OF THE DOE LAWSUIT DEFENSE EXPENSES TO THE 2011-2012 POLICY PERIOD AND FOR JUDGMENT ON THE SPECIFIC AND AGGREGATE EXCESS LOSS CLAIMS. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
|
|
Filing
93
OPINION AND ORDER denying 84 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
|
|
Filing
76
OPINION AND ORDER (1) Granting in Part and Denying in Part 59 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; and (2) Granting in Part and Denying in Part 57 Plaintiffs' Joint Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (SPin)
|
|
Filing
40
OPINION AND ORDER denying 22 Motion for relief from Rule H.. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
