Garner et al v. Roseville, City of et al
Lawrence M. Garner, Christopher Garner and William Kaupus |
Roseville, City of, Glenn Sexton, Rodney Browning and John Doe 1-10 |
2:2016cv10760 |
March 3, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Wayne |
David R. Grand |
Victoria A. Roberts |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 FINAL APPROVAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiff. GRANTING Motions: 26 MOTION for Judgment filed by Lawrence M. Garner, Rudalev, LLC, Cordia Michigan, LLC, Garner Properties & Management, William Kaupus, Christopher Garner, 25 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Lawrence M. Garner, Rudalev, LLC, Cordia Michigan, LLC, Garner Properties & Management, William Kaupus, Christopher Garner. Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (CPin) |
Filing 24 AMENDED STIPULATED ORDER CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS; PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND SETTING DATES, ( Fairness Hearing set for 1/16/2018 09:00 AM before District Judge Victoria A. Roberts)See order for amended deadlines Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (CPin) |
Filing 19 ORDER Consolidating Cases; Certifying Settlement Class; Preliminarily Approving Class Action Settlement Agreement and Setting Dates. Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (CPin) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.