Doe 1 v. Deja Vu Consulting, Inc et al
| Jane Doe 1 |
| Deja Vu Consulting, Inc, DV Saginaw, LLC, Deja Vu Showgirls, Harry Mohney and Deja Vu Services, Inc. |
| 2:2016cv10877 |
| March 10, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Bay City Office |
| Bay |
| Thomas L. Ludington |
| Patricia T. Morris |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
OPINION and ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' 86 Motion to Amend/Correct; Finding as Moot 98 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (DPar)
|
|
Filing
77
OPINION and ORDER Overruling 39 , 47 , 50 , 51 , 56 Objections; Granting 41 Motion for Final Approval of Settlement; Granting Amended 43 Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs; Finding as Moot 12 Motion to Dismiss and; Finding as Moot 42 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (DPar)
|
|
Filing
32
OPINION and ORDER Granting 27 Joint MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (DPar)
|
|
Filing
31
OPINION and ORDER Granting the Parties' 29 Joint MOTION for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, (Fairness Hearing set for 6/6/2017 02:00 PM before District Judge Stephen J. Murphy III). Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (DPar)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
