NEWMAN et al v. ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP, INC. et al
| JOANNE NEWMAN and SAUNDRA RYAN |
| ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP, INC., ASSET ACCEPTANCE CAPITAL CORP. aka ASSET ACCEPTANCE, MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, KARLI ANNE PETERSON and JANE AND JOHN DOE NOTARIES (1-10) |
| 2:2016cv11395 |
| April 19, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Oakland |
| David R. Grand |
| Matthew F. Leitman |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER (1) Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' 54 Motion for Protective Order and (2) Extending Discovery Deadline. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER (1) Denying Plaintiff's 47 MOTION to Expedite Rule 16 Conference as Moot, (2) Denying Defendants' 49 Amended MOTION for Summary Judgment Without Prejudice, and (3) Setting Merits Discovery Period. (Merits Discovery due by 1/22/2018, TELEPHONIC Status Conference set for 2/1/2018 at 2:00 PM before District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. **PLEASE USE THE CALL-IN INFORMATION PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED**) Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
|
|
Filing
39
OPINION and ORDER (1) Dismissing Some of Plaintiffs' Claims for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction; and (2)Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' 20 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
