Brown v. Rivard et al
| Ronald Kirk Brown |
| Steve Rivard, Siefker, Kellogg, Sounder, Bugbee, Kathleen Sheet-Parsons and Kelly Barnett |
| 2:2016cv11837 |
| May 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Sean F. Cox |
| R. Steven Whalen |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER Adopting 50 Report and Recommendation for Granting 42 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Siefker, Sounder. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (BGar)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S 52 Motion to Appoint Counsel - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 44 Motion to Compel AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 45 Motion to Appoint Counsel - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER denying 35 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; and to take Defendant's depositions- Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER Adopting 7/14/2017 26 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (TMcg)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 23 Motion to Appoint Counsel - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Eastern District of Michigan; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (Magistrate Judge Ray Kent, fhw) [Transferred from miwd on 5/23/2016.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
