Synergen Inc. v. FCA US LLC
| Synergen Inc. |
| FCA US LLC |
| FCA US LLC |
| Synergen Inc. |
| FCA US LLC |
| Uusi LLC |
| 2:2016cv11842 |
| May 24, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Nancy G. Edmunds |
| R. Steven Whalen |
| Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
132
OPINION AND ORDER Denying Defendant's 114 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's 89 Motion to Enforce Court Order. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER Granting (1) Defendant's 86 Motion to Adopt Special Master's Report and Recommendation and (2) Plaintiff's Counsel's 88 Amended Motion for Withdrawal of Attorney. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER Granting (1) Defendant's 79 Motion to Adopt 78 Special Discovery Master's First Rule 53 Report and Recommendation Regarding Certain Discovery Disputes and (2) Defendant's 82 Motion to Adopt 81 Special Discovery Master's Second Rule 53 Report and Recommendation Regarding Certain Discovery Disputes. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER on Status Conference. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
