Lyons et al v. Oakland County Prosecutor's Office et al
| David Lyons, Dorian Willis and Yalaunda Butts |
| Oakland County Prosecutor's Office, Macomb County Prosecutor's Office and Wayne County Prosecutor's Office |
| 2:2016cv12561 |
| July 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Oakland |
| Mona K. Majzoub |
| Arthur J. Tarnow |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER adopting 41 Report and Recommendation; Denying 32 Motion for Judgment. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER denying 29 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 35 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 37 Motion for Reconsideration; denying in part 30 Motion Requesting that Plaintiff's Civil Action Caption and Pleading Represent the Amended Complaint; Resolving 32 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Overruling 38 , 39 Objections. Plaintiff Butts' Amended Complaint is to be filed on or before 4/2/2018. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER granting 18 Motion to Quash; denying as moot 20 Motion to Substitute Party; finding as moot 21 Motion for Relief from Judgment; adopting 25 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
