Bird v. Klee
Petitioner: Dennis Bird
Respondent: Paul Klee
Case Number: 2:2016cv12973
Filed: August 15, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Lenawee
Presiding Judge: Stephanie Dawkins Davis
Presiding Judge: Victoria A. Roberts
Nature of Suit: General
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 Opinion and Order Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Denying Certificate of Appealability. Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (LVer)
August 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER denying 9 Motion for Discovery ; denying 10 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 11 Motion to Expand the Record. Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (CPin)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bird v. Klee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dennis Bird
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Paul Klee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?