Postell v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Kendra Postell
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 2:2016cv13645
Filed: October 13, 2016
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Office: Detroit Office
County: Oakland
Presiding Judge: Mark A. Goldsmith
Referring Judge: R. Steven Whalen
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:205
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 26, 2018 22 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION and ORDER (1) Adopting Magistrate Judge's 21 Report and Recommendation; (2) Granting In Part and Denying In Part Plaintiff's 16 Motion for Summary Judgment; (3) Granting In Part and Denying In Part Defendant's 20 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Postell v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kendra Postell
Represented By: Eva I. Guerra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?