Wesley Corporation et al v. ZOOM T.V. PRODUCTS et al
Wesley Corporation and David Hanson |
ZOOM T.V. PRODUCTS and IDEAVILLAGE PRODUCTS CORPORATION |
2:2017cv10021 |
January 4, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Kent |
Robert H. Cleland |
Stephanie Dawkins Davis |
Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 97 OPINION AND ORDER denying 93 Defendant's Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag) |
Filing 77 JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants Zoom T.V. Products and Ideavillage Products Corportion against Plaintiffs Wesley Corporation and David Hanson Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag) |
Filing 47 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTED IN PART 36 Motion for Protective Order; DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE 41 Motion to Compel; DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE 42 Motion to Compel; Extending Dispositive Motion cutoff to 2/9/2018 and setting the deadline to file the memorandum requesting attorney fees by 1/19/2018. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag) |
Filing 43 ORDER Requiring Plaintiffs to Comply with Formatting Rules. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag) |
Filing 19 ORDER on Appearances of Local Counsel, setting deadline of 4/11/2017 and setting a ( Scheduling Conference for 4/19/2017 09:00 AM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.