Garvin v. MacLaren
Petitioner: Stanford Garvin
Respondent: Duncan MacLaren
Case Number: 2:2017cv10206
Filed: January 24, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Chippewa
Presiding Judge: Avern Cohn
Presiding Judge: Patricia T. Morris
Nature of Suit: General
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER denying 10 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (MVer)
September 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENTS MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 5)AND DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (MVer)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garvin v. MacLaren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Stanford Garvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Duncan MacLaren
Represented By: John S. Pallas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?