Harris v. Yum! Brands, Inc. et al
Cheryl Harris |
Yum! Brands, Inc., Pizza Hut of America, Inc., Redberry Resto Brands Intl., Inc., Redberry Resto-Brands, Inc. and John Doe Entities 1 through 10 |
2:2017cv10239 |
January 25, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Wayne |
Gershwin A. Drain |
R. Steven Whalen |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 107 CORRECTION: OPINION and ORDER Denying Defendant Bullet Guard Corporation's 99 MOTION to Dismiss and Canceling Hearing. Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (TMcg) |
Filing 88 OPINION and ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' 67 MOTION for Summary Judgment, Granting 66 Motion for Leave to File Notice of Non-Party Fault and Denying 80 MOTION to Amend/Correct 62 Amended Complaint, 1 Complaint. Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (TMcg) |
Filing 59 ORDER Severing Defendant Malibu Builders and Setting Dates., ( Discovery due by 2/5/2019, Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 2/19/2019, Final Pretrial Conference set fo r 3/26/2019 02:00 PM before District Judge Gershwin A. Drain, Jury Trial set for 4/9/2019 09:00 AM before District Judge Gershwin A. Drain) (See Order for additional dates.) Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (JOwe) |
Filing 46 ORDER granting 34 Motion To compel Discovery Responses to Include Signed Authorizations.. Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (TBan) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.