Thomas v. Hoffner
Petitioner: James Thomas
Respondent: Bonita Hoffner
Case Number: 2:2017cv10395
Filed: February 6, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Branch
Presiding Judge: Avern Cohn
Presiding Judge: David R. Grand
Nature of Suit: General
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR AN AMENDED JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (MVer)
April 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR EQUITABLE TOLLING AND DISMISSING THE PETITION AS UNTIMELY Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (MVer)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. Hoffner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bonita Hoffner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?